The Da Vinci Code Breaker
Wednesday, July 27th, 2005A New York Times Best seller titled "The Da Vinci Code" claims that a 2,000 year old church conspiracy can be decoded through the ingenious use of codes left as clues by Leonardo Da Vinci.
If you read the novel, please remember that you got the book from the fiction aisle. If you haven’t read the novel and planning to read it; please remember it is merely fiction.
The biggest giveaway that this novel is fiction is through its basis - the apocrypha. In my opinion, fiction and apocrypha should be synonyms.
The premise of the novel is that Mary Magdalene was actually the wife of Jesus. She was pregnant and about to give birth at the time Jesus was crucified, fearing for her and the unborn child’s life, she fled to France with the help of Joseph of Arimathea. The child, Sarah, who can miraculously heal people was born and in turn started the Merovingian dynasty. The Templar Knights found the record of genealogy and amassed a fortune by blackmailing the church. The Templars were executed by the church but some knights survived with the record who gave it to the Priory of Sion for protection, its secrets is passed on from one grand master to the next. The secret is sealed, the current descendant Jesus and Mary Magdalene is protected by the Priory of Sion until the new grand master rose to the ranks- Leonardo Da Vinci. Learning its secrets, Da Vinci coded the secrets in his artwork: In "The Last Supper" the man on Jesus’ right is not really a man but Mary Magdalene. The grail that is supposedly on Jesus’ side is deliberately missing, denoting that the grail is not really tableware but Mary Magdalene herself. She is the vessel of Christ’s blood also denoted by the "V-space" between Jesus and Mary Magdalene.
Let’s deconstruct from the painting to the crucifixion, shall we. At the time Da Vinci painted "The Last Supper" John the beloved is always depicted as a young, often drowsy, effeminate, unbearded man. It’s not biblical, it’s just the convention at the time. The V-space is done for dramatic effect. The missing grail wasn’t really important because according to Sir Thomas Malory’s Arthurian legends, the grail is not the grail from the last supper but the grail used by Joesph of Arimathea to collect Jesus’ blood before burial. (Note: This is not Biblical) The Priory of Sion never had Leonardo as grand master nor even a member. There is no historical background linking them. The Templar Knights drew its money from pilgrims and popular support from the rich. The Templars did not find a record of genealogy though many legends are attributed to them including Solomon’s mines. The Merovingian dynasty ended, unlike the novel’s claim that there are descendants alive to this day. There is a French legend that a child named Sarah, whose mother came by an oar-less boat, healed the sick just like Jesus. But it is just a legend, there is no further evidence/proof of their existence. If Mary Magdalene was pregnant and fled to France and gave birth, how then did she manage to proclaim that the tomb is empty after three days? In the apocrypha, Jesus kisses Mary Magdalene on the lips and that act infuriates the disciples. Consider this, If they were married, then the disciples should not get angry because it is only natural for married couples to do that. If we think that Jesus and Mary Magdalene had an illicit affair, it still doesn’t make sense because why would God break the first institution (marriage) He created? And also, according to Jewish law, they would both deserve stoning at the first sign of pregnancy out of wedlock (remember, she was allegedly about to give birth?).
Believing in the lies that spewed out of this novel undermines the deity of Christ. Furthermore, If Jesus had an offspring, the Trinity would be a mockery. The passage "…His throne shall be established forever" (1 Ch 17:14b) refers to Jesus ruling forever and underscores the fact that there is no heir. If there was an heir, it should say "His throne shall be established for a very long time." Forever isn’t just a very long time; it has no end. No end = no need for heirs.
The bottom line: Figures don’t lie but liars sure can figure.